Comments on: EVISCERATING A REGISTRAR (Guts and Blood Are Revealed)

By: stewart

stewart — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:38:46 +0000

I am happy to do that however where as I am now represented by Kamber Edelson
http://www.kamberedelson.com/ in the class action perhaps it is better you speak with them directly @
Michael J. Aschenbrener | KamberEdelson LLC
350 N. LaSalle St., Suite 1300
Chicago, IL 60654
1.312.589.6379 (direct) | 1.312.589.6370 (firm) | 1.312.589.6378 (fax)
maschenbrener@kamberedelson.com | http://www.kamberedelson.com

By: stewart

stewart — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:51:20 +0000

Im with you on all this bro…the people who run these companies are all in line for indictments before it is all said and done so far as I can tell, snapnames’ Mr Brady is probably the poter boy du jour, but he is only todays blue plate special, there surely is more to follow, can you hear the rats scurry as the water rises?

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

Hi Stew!

How about giving me some other scandals or “weird” situations for my story on the Domain Industry and its image? Have any other suggestions about other unethical conduct? Let me know. You can email me if you want.

By: Fckyou

Fckyou — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:25:08 +0000

You all have no idea what you are talking about, you cheap mother fckers. Go grow some balls and make some money….. Pussies!!!

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

These types of posts help me understand that not all men are created equal. Some men (I’m assuming he has male genitals) call other men “pussies”, while HIDING behind anonymous posts. It amazes me that there are morons who post these comments without logically thinking through their own position, typically, being “frightened” about posting their real names and info.

However, if anyone wants to make a quick $50 bucks by Paypal, and can identify this poster, here’s the info I got from his comment (some fake, and probably the IP address is a proxy). However, I will pay someone to tell me how they found the ID.

Here you go! Have fun!

NAME: Fckyou
Email: bob@aol.com
(IP: 208.44.137.195 , 208-44-137-195.dia.static.qwest.net)
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=208.44.137.195

By: BT

BT — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:47:08 +0000

I also worked for IYD for quite some time and can tell you that nothing they did was illegal. They followed ICANN policy and never scammed anyone. Both Ted Cucci and Jim McKenzie are very reputable and did nothing dishonest or immoral regarding their business practices.

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

And your name is…???? hidden? Anonymous email? No website? Do your initials “BT” stand for “BOGUS TALK”?
Show your face when you make a claim that doesn’t address the FACTS of my article, proven with screenshots and firsthand experience I had with IYD. You make your claim not knowing I CONSULT for registrars, and I know the good ones and the bad ones, and the bad ones follow a common path… somewhat similar to WebNameSolution.com for the moment (10/09). I’d like to get an explanation from either Ted or Jim or both on why I lost three domains I bought from Snapnames that they offered up and didn’t change ownership on my whois info after the sale as required. It wasn’t possible for me to do it since an account was never created in my name at IYD after I purchased the domains. This is old news, so put it to bed. Tucows has them neatly tucked away…

By: Anonym

Anonym — Fri, 22 May 2009 06:05:40 +0000

Can’t tell you any more because it is a lie and have no proof of any wrong doing. BT

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

That is sad. Don’t make accusations without having the proof to back them up. Or, if you’re scared of repercussions and lawsuits from GD, then just say “I’m scared”. I’ll post it.

By: Anonym

Anonym — Thu, 14 May 2009 02:49:26 +0000

I have worked for IYD for quite a while. Their practices especially those enforced by Ted Cucci and Jim McKenzie, the current owners of Network Merchants, were horrible. They were scamming people when it came to transfers, renewals, redemptions and I am pretty sure they are doing the same kind of scam with Network Merchants.

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

Really? Tell us more!

By: jerry garcia

jerry garcia — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:59:29 +0000

(Request from Jerry to remove previous post, but I think his statements are relevant to my article).

XXXXXX Stephen Douglas Responds:

Hi Jerry,

You aren’t the only one who has complained about this registrar. Don’t lose your nerve, make our factual statement and stand behind it. These types of companies who fail to service their customers fairly expect that people will just walk away from their anger and their money, which in turn, keeps them on the same path of hurting more customers.

Good article.