formats

WHY 3D DOMAINS ARE DEAD, AND FUTURE TREND DOMAINS ARE STUPID

Caught your eyes, didn’t I?  Is this wish fulfillment or a serious concern? If it’s “wish fulfillment”, you better look for better wishes. For all those people who don’t “get it” about Future Trend domains, here’s a miniscule bit of 3D technology that FT domainers have known about for years. I can’t wait to hear the trollers and oldtimers who still don’t understand FT domaining.  I bet that there won’t be more than three negative comments about investing in 3D domains.

(Link credit to Robert Mclean)

Please, people, don’t do what FT domainers do on educating themselves on what’s coming up big. We don’t need anymore “speculators” in the FT domain world!

Be Sociable, Share!
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
18 Comments  comments 
formats

THE GENIUS OF ELLIOT SILVER

I don’t write headlines very often – well, actually never, that point people’s attention away from my otherworldly mind. (Not sure if that sounds right!).  However, a very simple (‘ere genius) article by our fellow domain blogger, Elliot Silver, really pulled out some excellent questions all domain investors should try to answer, including those who work within the nameless, faceless corporations that have sprouted from this business.

First, nice list of questions, El. Spot on. I like all of them, especially #1 and #9, but so many other commenters for your article were so on point, too. I think every major domain industry corporation should copy your blog and do an interoffice global memo.  “Time to fix things, team. Start memorizing these complaints and submitting your ideas to the front office. These domainers are getting smarter by the day!”

(Here’s my responses to some of the readers commenting on El’s blog article):

@Dev
- of course there are a few (one) veteran domainers who feels arrogance breeds success for him in this industry, when it does the exact opposite when looked at by objective end user professionals interested in buying domains. You can see them at their ad budget board meeting saying: “Who are these clowns, and why is this one guy who sold a few big domains in the last decade lecturing everyone else about his genius in claims to “predicting” domain values over a decade ago and referring to the general domain public as idiots? Hasn’t domaining evolved yet?”

Then you have the major domain companies selling you stuff YOU DON’T NEED, which then makes the “buy-a-domain” ad point look like a small section of a larger “UPSELL” scam.  Oh Daddy, say it ain’t so.  For any noob who is ready to simply BUY a domain name for their company, bypass the other crap and remember this quote we domainers take to heart: “It’s the domain name, stupid!”

@Tony   — GoDaddy still snubs its nose at this completely obvious way to keeping  you from selling your domains AWAY from their registrar because they send you the ICANN notice to “update” your whois info about 30 days before your domain expires. If you sell that domain you changed your phone number on, guess what, your buyer has to open an acct at GoDaddy to get that domain or your screwed, or the buyer is screwed too, because who wants to buy domains at GD?  It’s an ethical slip on the GD sidewalk that has no “ice” on it.  For shame. Lots of blog articles about this issue, do a search on Google to find out more.

Then there’s the Domain auction sites doing little or nothing to earn their 15% “listing fees”, but are very hot on getting you to change your NS to their PPC servers while they list them for you!  I am ashamed to say I created and first implemented this “revenue path” back in 2005 for a major registrar. We actually had to change the TOS to legally “inform and require” domain buyers to agree to allow PPC ads on their listed domain “default” pages if the domain owner did not provide one. Now the auction sites are in the PPC sales game, which every domain investor knows by now IS NOT TRANSPARENT. Period. You will NEVER know what your true CPC has truly netted the two/three middle men before you.

This process was so profitable, every registrar does this now. So—Noobs beware. lol

@ Christopher — I guarantee you that all ethical domainers who aren’t full of themselves agree with you on this one. You made a great call. However, the caveat is this:  EVERY BUSINESS IS EXACTLY THE SAME WAY OR WORSE.  The same idiots exist in real estate, finance, manufacturing, entertainment (whooo boy!) and advertising (WHOOOO BOY!) and every other money-making enterprises, including religion. The reason the Domain Industry is so slow in representing themselves as professional only applies on the “peanut gallery” level, which I myself happen to be in at times.  The big money boys are definitely looking at end user sales now because the days of wine and incest in domaining are over.

Read more…

Be Sociable, Share!
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
6 Comments  comments 
formats

FUTURE TREND DOMAIN INVESTORS GET THE BIG PUSH…IT’S REAL

The doubters of “Future Trend” domain investing in this industry who had reservations and most likely a misunderstandings of what it takes to invest in FT domains may be impressed with Billboard’s headlining article on hologram celebrities performing in this technology. It seems hundreds of estates of some of the best “deceased” performers are stampeding to this new technology.

Hologram concerts, events, DJ’s, and any visual format and medium for presenting a quality reproduction of a popular, but no longer living performer, is the new rage in technology and entertainment presentation.

It’s no longer a “point of contention” from short-sighted domainers who missed out on the unbelievable market of FT domains that were “smart bought” by FT domainers, because now the naysayers are quietly nibbling their toes. Never before has a domain name niche exploded on the scene with direct identification of where the market is. When 3D domains were the big trend (and they still are), there were so many uninformed domain investors (I think that’s what they were) ridiculed the buyers of 3D domains, and attributing their negative comments specifically to “3DTV”.   Whooops!  3D is all over the category map, and if any of the cynics did their homework, they’d know that, and stay quiet.  That would give them the chance to pick up one or two of some powerful OOTB purchases in this category.  Only one domainer I know of actually learned from this and made a smart move — “smart” glasses by Rick Schwartz. It isn’t the “category killer” that Berkens indicates, but it’s a great domain name that can push across several categories to reach brands that would pay big money (more than $4k) to own Rick’s domain.

With Hologram Celebrity concerts becoming a hot new venue for corporate producers, the hologram niche is a new domain market so wide open for FT domainers to take advantage of these domains, it’s like Christmas in the summer.  That’s a timely comment, obviously. so when you read this in the winter of 2012,  you probably will have heard of some incredible FT domain successes.

Stay tuned for more updates on this incredible, top-of-the-page entertainment news reports coming out of Hollywood.  This marketing niche is so big that I will personally be following the marketing news articles and blog reports to try to keep you up to date on what is happening as fast as the news comes in.

Cheers to the smart investors in FT domains! The Future is YOURS.

 

Be Sociable, Share!
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 
formats

ALL SHOOK UP… ELVIS PRESLEY HELPS TITANIC PRODUCER WITH FUTURE TREND DOMAINS!

Many of you have read accounts of the Tupac Skakur Hologram concert series being developed, but this is just the beginning. New Media marketing reports from the entertainment industry are welcome treasure maps for FT (Future Trend) domainers.  The Tupac hologram shows will be eclipsed by the Elvis Presley Hologram Concerts coming soon from the Titanic producer, James Cameron. (Oh, as a side note, Cameron also did the ground-breaking movie miracle sensation, “AVATAR”.)

All the anonymous and seemingly tepid commenters on blogs regarding FT domain investments suddenly look more like the old-timers in 1905 who were saying that the automobile would never replace the horse and buggy.

The facts:  Cameron’s company, Digital Domain Media Group has cornered a deal to develop an Elvis Presley “event” featuring Presley performing as a hologram image. According to the Hollywood Reporter, this move will open up “new growth opportunities for the visual effects company.”  Obviously, there will be hundreds more “digital media” companies taking advantage of one of the most ambitious entertainment visuals ever in history, using hologram concerts and events based on film footage of performers/celebrities/famous people

Successclick.com and several of its Future Trend (FT) domain investing partners, have captured the majority of all significant Premium domains in the hologram/holograph genre. Remember, HOLOGRAM and HOLOGRAPH are interchangeable. Although “holograph” as a word has a larger meaning than “hologram”, either word is acceptable, but what Successclick is discovering is that the term “hologram” is making a bigger impact as far as prodserv branding and recognition. Does this mean that “hologram” domains will be more valuable than “holograph” domains? At this point, it’s hard to say. However, both will be huge nouns and adjectives for all the entertainment industry by 2015.

Successclick and their members in the FT domain investing arena have read hundreds of belittling and “no-nothing” comments about “FT domains”.  When a well-known domain investor then bought a “Future Trend” domain name a month or so back, it was obvious that FT domaining principles were now being considered as a viable investment procedure. The big domainer bought a domain he thought had “profit potential”. He figured the domain would be “brand smart”, based on Google’s new eyeglass mapping system. and the domain could potentially represent the product to go along with their technology.

The domain bought by the the domainer, which was heralded by MHB  as “the next category killer domain name for under $4k “, is clear proof that “old money domainers” are also looking to Future Trend domains as speculative investments.

The problem with the article by MHB is that he missed the fact, maybe because FT domainers stay mostly quiet at this time about what we have in our combined portfolio, that at least five to ten FT domainers own domains that fit the “google project” glasses better than “Smart glasses dot com”.   In no way can this MHB article featuring a friend’s domain purchase, (nothing against Berkens), to be a “category killer” in the respect of computer/internet-based eyeglasses domain names.

Successclick.com and their partners own two of the real category-killer domains in this genre:

Read more…

Be Sociable, Share!
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
13 Comments  comments 
formats

SuccessClick.com

Published on May 18, 2012 by in SuccessClick

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
Comments Off  comments